5 thoughts on “SeoRi – Running through the night + Hairdryer [MVs]”
I expressed my thoughts on “Running through the night” elsewhere (great song), but I just wanted to add just how great the visuals are. I’ve always liked the ‘distant plants filling the sky’ aesthetic. Beautiful.
Hard to tell, vimeo encoding settings or an SQ source file could affect quality. YT files don’t looks better and have the same “issue”.
Btw pixelization or frame-rate issue? In some wide shots while camera is moving there is some duplicate frames, play the video at 01″24′ you’ll see it’s not playing as it should be for a 23.976 fps video.
I think @FLKpop could find what’s wrong better than me.
Thanks, google automatic subtitles looks interesting but I can’t watch video through web browser.
Maybe someone with a decent internet could give his feedback?
I looked at the RTTN video. Looks like a combo of mistakes and bad decisions. They’ve added noise to better blend visual effects to live footage; to add ‘life’ to normally clean & static VFX shots so they won’t look so artificial. But the video has an average bitrate of only ~4 mbps which is often not enough to compress noise without making a smeary coarse mess.
As you mentioned, there are some shots with clear frame rate issues. Hard to say what they’ve tried to achieve but in a video playing at 23.976 fps it’s odd to see a shot duplicate every 10th frame. It’s normal for a video shot at 23.976 and playing at 29.97 duplicate every fifth frame but this feels like an error. It might be the shot is a composite of elements shot at different frame rates (very bad planning and/or execution) and this is the result of someone trying to fix that problem. This is not a case of faked slow motion either.
Thank you very for your lights, this is unfortunate, the YT version (2,268 Kbps) have the same issues, as you said this could be a mistake, I’ve seen worse but to me this MV deserved better.
I expressed my thoughts on “Running through the night” elsewhere (great song), but I just wanted to add just how great the visuals are. I’ve always liked the ‘distant plants filling the sky’ aesthetic. Beautiful.
Hopefully more people will check out “Running through the night.” It’s definitely worth four minutes and thirty-five seconds of your time, IMO.
BTW, thanks for the Vimeo versions.
Hard to tell, vimeo encoding settings or an SQ source file could affect quality. YT files don’t looks better and have the same “issue”.
Btw pixelization or frame-rate issue? In some wide shots while camera is moving there is some duplicate frames, play the video at 01″24′ you’ll see it’s not playing as it should be for a 23.976 fps video.
I think @FLKpop could find what’s wrong better than me.
Thanks, google automatic subtitles looks interesting but I can’t watch video through web browser.
Maybe someone with a decent internet could give his feedback?
I looked at the RTTN video. Looks like a combo of mistakes and bad decisions. They’ve added noise to better blend visual effects to live footage; to add ‘life’ to normally clean & static VFX shots so they won’t look so artificial. But the video has an average bitrate of only ~4 mbps which is often not enough to compress noise without making a smeary coarse mess.
As you mentioned, there are some shots with clear frame rate issues. Hard to say what they’ve tried to achieve but in a video playing at 23.976 fps it’s odd to see a shot duplicate every 10th frame. It’s normal for a video shot at 23.976 and playing at 29.97 duplicate every fifth frame but this feels like an error. It might be the shot is a composite of elements shot at different frame rates (very bad planning and/or execution) and this is the result of someone trying to fix that problem. This is not a case of faked slow motion either.
Thank you very for your lights, this is unfortunate, the YT version (2,268 Kbps) have the same issues, as you said this could be a mistake, I’ve seen worse but to me this MV deserved better.
NB: Video published by the color grading team.